Lab 6 continue

With the help of more than two of my classmates, results of lab 6 was produced

After examining the given code, and Professor's hint and suggestion. We were able to measure the time taken to manipulate the samples on each code, by timing the full code then subtract by the timing of the code without the code of manipulating the sample.

(Full code) - (Code without sample manipulating) = (code of manipulation)

The following information are time required for the code of manipulation

(Archie) (Archie) 2
aarchie.cdot.systems aarchie.cdot.systems
vol 1 vol 1
real 7.01 real 7.402
user 7.547 user 7.611
sys -0.6 sys -0.222
vol 2 vol 2
real 12.547 real 12.614
user 12.925 user 12.964
sys -0.418 sys -0.388
vol 3 vol 3
real 4.343 real 4.266
user 4.164 user 3.943
sys 2.203 sys 0.309
(Bbetty) (Bbetty) 2
2200 ehl.cdot.systems 2200 ehl.cdot.systems
vol 1 vol 1
real 0.873 real 0.925
user 0.887 user 0.892
sys -0.01 sys 0.03
vol 2 vol 2
real 0.935 real 1.426
user 0.98 user 1.324
sys -0.05 sys 0.1
vol 3 vol 3
real 0.583 real 1.115
user 0.584 user 1.058
sys 0 sys 0.05
(Ccharlie) (Ccharlie) 2
2205 ehl.cdot.systems 2205 ehl.cdot.systems
vol 1 vol 1
real 1.663 real 1.713
user 1.643 user 1.764
sys 0.03 sys -0.05
vol 2 vol 2
real 2.508 real 2.536
user 2.47 user 2.496
sys 0.04 sys 0.03
vol 3 vol 3
real 1.207 real 1.224
user 1.184 user 1.216
sys 0.02 sys 0.009
(Israel) (Israel) 2
israel.cdot.systems israel.cdot.systems
vol 1 vol 1
real 1.425 real 1.467
user 1.415 user 1.455
sys 0.005 sys 0.004
vol 2 vol 2
real 2.49 real 2.562
user 2.48 user 2.544
sys 0.005 sys 0.016
vol 3 vol 3
real 0.755 real 0.759
user 0.735 user 0.742
sys 0.017 sys 0.011
(Xerxes) (Xerxes) 2
xerxes.cdot.systems xerxes.cdot.systems
vol 1 vol 1
real 0.458 real 0.392
user 0.467 user 0.401
sys -0.01 sys -0.011
vol 2 vol 2
real 0.291 real 0.406
user 0.296 user 0.398
sys -0.005 sys 0.008
vol 3 vol 3
real 0.358 real 0.336
user 0.368 user 0.355
sys -0.011 sys -0.021

Conclusion
First, Xerxes is too powerful for this lab and can't be use to identify which method is faster.

Second, from every other machine test it turns out that the third method "Fix-point" was the fastest method. Which was surprising, during group lab every member conclude the second method "look-up table" would be the fastest.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Lab 01: Code Review

Course Project Stage 2 Introduction

Course Project Stage 2 part 2: Profiling